- Quellen
Abendroth, J., Richter, T.: How to understand what you don’t believe: Metacognitive training prevents belief-biases in multiple text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 71, 2021
Bråten, I., et al.: The role of sourcing in discourse comprehension. The Routledge handbook of discourse processes. S. 141-166, Routledge, 2017
Britt, M. A., et al.: A Reasoned Approach to Dealing With Fake News. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6, 2019
Bromme, R.: Informiertes Vertrauen: Eine psychologische Perspektive auf Vertrauen in Wissenschaft. In: M. Jungert, A. et al. (Hrsg.), Wissenschaftsreflexion. Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven zwischen Philosophie und Praxis, S.105-134. Mentis, 2020
Chinn, C. A. et al.: Education for a “Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice. Educational Researcher 50, 51–60, 2021
Furnham, A., Marks, J.: Tolerance of Ambiguity: A Review of the Recent Literature. Psychology 4, 2013
Hendriks, F. et al.: Constraints and Affordances of Online Engagement With Scientific Information – A Literature Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 2020
Muis, K. R. et al.: Epistemic Emotions and Epistemic Cognition Predict Critical Thinking About Socio-Scientific Issues. Frontiers in Education 6, 2021
Pica, G., et al.: The epistemic bases of changes of opinion and choices: The joint effects of the need for cognitive closure, ascribed epistemic authority and quality of advice. European Journal of Social Psychology, ejsp.2753, 2021
Scharrer, L. et al.: Information Easiness Affects Non-experts’ Evaluation of Scientific Claims About Which They Hold Prior Beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology 12, 2021
Schlink, S., Walther, E.: Kurz und gut: Eine deutsche Kurzskala zur Erfassung des Bedürfnisses nach kognitiver Geschlossenheit. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 38, 2007
Sharon, A. J., Baram‐Tsabari, A.: Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life? Science Education 104, 873–894, 2020
Sinatra, G. M., Lombardi, D.: Evaluating sources of scientific evidence and claims in the post-truth era may require reappraising plausibility judgments. Educational Psychologist 55, S. 120–131, 2020
Vogl, E. et al.: Surprise, Curiosity, and Confusion Promote Knowledge Exploration: Evidence for Robust Effects of Epistemic Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology 10, 2019
Schreiben Sie uns!
Beitrag schreiben